Leaving Work

Why I Left the Institutional Church – Part 2

Looking at the difference between the early Church and today’s institutionalized expression made me feel sorrowful. In the early days, each believer was given opportunity to express their revelation of Christ in the gatherings. Songs, hymns, spiritual songs, teachings, revelations, tongues, interpretations–a beautiful tapestry was woven in the simplicity of their fellowship.

I must confess my love for movies–high-quality ones that make you think. When The Matrix came out in the theaters, I was in awe. The special effects were cutting edge for its time and the plot was enveloping. In the movie, Keanu Reaves plays Thomas A. Anderson, a computer programmer by day and elusive computer hacker by night. Operating under the online alias of “Neo,” Mr. Anderson is in the pursuit of the “The Matrix,” a science-fiction-like conspiracy theory. He’s convinced that it’s out there. He just hasn’t found it yet.

Through a series of extraordinary events, Neo finds himself at the top of an abandoned building with a mysterious man named Morpheus. He offers the inquisitive young man the opportunity to know the truth. However, the truth comes at a significant price. Here is the transcript of the offer Morpheus made to Neo:

Morpheus: This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back…You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes.

Neo pauses for an instant, then reaches for the red pill. He swallows it down with a glass of water, and looks at Morpheus.

Morpheus: Remember, all I’m offering you is the truth: nothing more.

I felt a little like Neo when I opened up Pagan Christianity by Frank Viola and George Barna. Needless to say, I took the red pill and began my journey down the rabbit hole.

Down the Rabbit Hole

The first thing I discovered through my reading was that the early Christians functioned in ways that were radically different from what is commonly referred to as “church” today. For the first 300 years, life in Christ was a corporate reality that came naturally and flowed out of the home, embracing family and relationships.  Believers met in each other’s homes, sharing their experiences over a meal. There were no church buildings or meeting halls. From the very beginning, Christian community was expressed in the most simple and natural of places—the home.

When they gathered, there was no predetermined order of service. They saw themselves as a family. As such, the gatherings were unscripted and spontaneous. When each person arrived, they understood that it was not only their right, but also their responsibility to contribute to the gathering. We see this explained in 1 Corinthians 14:26: “When you assemble, each one has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation, has a tongue, has an interpretation.” In that time, every person was a minister in the practical sense of the word. Their gatherings had active participants, not passive spectators.

Church structure also looked different. In today’s “church” model, the pastor presides over the people of God. He is the one who blesses civic events, marries the young, buries the old, represents the group to the outside world, and exercises spiritual authority over them. Essentially, the modern-day pastor is the functioning “head” of the church. This concept would have been foreign to the early Christians.

For the first three centuries, there is no evidence of a hierarchical, top-down, chain-of-command. They understood that the Body of Christ has only one “head,” which is Christ Jesus Himself. Therefore, He occupied much more than an honorific role in church leadership. He was the Source of all guidance and direction. Each member of the Body had direct access to the Head. Therefore, questions such as “Who is your spiritual authority?” or “Who is your covering?” would be simple for the ancient believers. Without question, they would say, “That’s easy. It’s Jesus Christ.”

Shocking Implications

Looking at the difference between the early Church and today’s institutionalized expression made me feel sorrowful.  In the early days, each believer was given opportunity to express their revelation of Christ in the gatherings.  Songs, hymns, spiritual songs, teachings, revelations, tongues, interpretations–a beautiful tapestry was woven in the simplicity of their fellowship.  Each member, freely functioning under the headship of Christ, expressed His beauty and presence in a remarkable way.

In contrast, the format of institutional church services today seem to  inhibit the expression of non-”professional” people of God.  Although my wife and I were given great freedom to express our gifts, it seemed like the majority of people in the congregation were passive observers.  Countless Sundays went by where the traditional structure kept them from expressing their revelation of Jesus.  I think back to the times when I felt that I had nothing to preach on a certain Sunday morning.  Many times, I would struggle to not enter a place of striving just to produce something acceptable to give the people.  It was, of course, my “responsibility” to feed them–or so I had been taught.  Thinking back, I am convinced that there were times when God would have desired to reveal Himself through those silent saints who lacked the freedom to share their revelation of Christ.

Who is to blame for this tragic imprisonment of the people of God? That’s a difficult question to answer and it’s not my responsibility to judge that case.  Most professional ministers I have met have an authentic love for the people of God and want the people in their congregation to grow up into maturity.  I know that is true for the leaders of the church I was part of–they are authentic and well-intentioned.

Perhaps the only statement that can be made about this issue is that we are a product of the paradigm we’ve been raised in.  When all you know of “church” is filtered through the tradition of the previous generation, the way it’s supposedly “always been,” it’s difficult to consider something else.

As my wife and I considered the implications of the way the institution operates, for conscience sake, we decided that we could no longer be a part of it.  While God may not be calling every pastor to leave their role at this time, there was no question as to what our reponse should be.

Powerless and Vulnerable

Over the next few days, we begged the Father for wisdom.  Our hearts were grieved as we considered the possibility of leaving.  Relationships would be tested in the fire of obedience.  There was much opportunity to misunderstood.  Feelings would likely be hurt though we desperately wanted it to not be so.  In the wisdom of God, we had been led into a situation that we had absolutely no control over.  We found ourselves powerless and vulnerable.

We called the senior pastors and asked if they could come over for coffee on Saturday.  They cheerfully agreed. having no idea what was to come.  “Can we bring anything?” they asked.  “A ton of grace and some patience,” I thought to myself. With a mixture of resolve and anxiety, I looked into my wife’s beautiful emerald eyes.  They were calming and made me momentarily forget about the meeting.  “Can we fast forward a few months?” my wife asked with a smile.  “Sadly, no, Elisa.  We’re gonna’ have to walk through this valley together.”