<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Raw Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rawreligion.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rawreligion.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Testament and the People of God &#8211; Review 01 by Matthew Berry</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/book-reviews/ntpg-rev01#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=4318#comment-684</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t gotten to that book yet.  I hope to finish it sometime in the next year and then move on to JVG.  

I appreciate Wright&#039;s hermeneutic and epistemology (i.e. critical realism).

I&#039;ve enjoyed reading your blog.  Glad we could connect.

Do you do Skype?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten to that book yet.  I hope to finish it sometime in the next year and then move on to JVG.  </p>
<p>I appreciate Wright&#8217;s hermeneutic and epistemology (i.e. critical realism).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading your blog.  Glad we could connect.</p>
<p>Do you do Skype?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Testament and the People of God &#8211; Review 01 by Jeremy Myers</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/book-reviews/ntpg-rev01#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=4318#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting on my blog. It&#039;s how I found you. 

Did you like this book? I really enjoyed it, but for me &quot;Jesus and the Victory of God&quot; was stunning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting on my blog. It&#8217;s how I found you. </p>
<p>Did you like this book? I really enjoyed it, but for me &#8220;Jesus and the Victory of God&#8221; was stunning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evolution or Revolution &#8211; Pt  1 by Brian Devereaux</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/updates/evolution-or-revolution-pt1#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Devereaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawreligion.com/updates/evolution-or-revolution#comment-676</guid>
		<description>&quot;Christendom thinking…assumes that the church belongs prominently on the main street, and it claims that the church has the right to take over a public space and clean out the local people while creating a so-called sanctified religious zone....

 ....The missional church always thinks of the long haul rather than the quick fix.&quot;

    I&#039;m sure if you ask anyone in the traditional churches, they would say they&#039;re in it for the long haul. That brick building downtown has been there more than 150 years, and the denomination even longer. They have a sense of permanence and in a way their right. If two or three member families move out of town in the traditional church, it keeps right on going; if they leave a group meeting in someone&#039;s home, that could be the end of that.

I know brick and mortar is the wrong kind of permanence. I&#039;m just wondering about how do we get across the sense of being part of something eternally permanent,(and part of something bigger than a few people around my dining room table) especially to those young in the faith?    Just something to think about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Christendom thinking…assumes that the church belongs prominently on the main street, and it claims that the church has the right to take over a public space and clean out the local people while creating a so-called sanctified religious zone&#8230;.</p>
<p> &#8230;.The missional church always thinks of the long haul rather than the quick fix.&#8221;</p>
<p>    I&#8217;m sure if you ask anyone in the traditional churches, they would say they&#8217;re in it for the long haul. That brick building downtown has been there more than 150 years, and the denomination even longer. They have a sense of permanence and in a way their right. If two or three member families move out of town in the traditional church, it keeps right on going; if they leave a group meeting in someone&#8217;s home, that could be the end of that.</p>
<p>I know brick and mortar is the wrong kind of permanence. I&#8217;m just wondering about how do we get across the sense of being part of something eternally permanent,(and part of something bigger than a few people around my dining room table) especially to those young in the faith?    Just something to think about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tithe is Illegal by Amy</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/guest-articles/the-tithe-is-illegal#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawreligion.com/?p=66#comment-675</guid>
		<description>I just happened to find your website here as I was looking for the topic &quot;what does the bible say about debt.&quot; And, I must admit, what you are saying is true. To a degree, that is. 

On one hand, the ten percent rule and the notion of tithing in and of itself was done away with, this is true. However, Jesus commissioned His believers to give with a cheerful heart and with gladness. If anyone asks anything of us, we should give it to them. I think this would apply to us today. We should not be so greedy with what we have, and that included money. 

Some might say, &quot;Well, they don&#039;t share. They&#039;re not living right.&quot; Or, &quot;I called so n so church for help, and they wouldn&#039;t help me. They aren&#039;t a good church or christians.&quot; These things are so very common throughout our nation. I think that we human people rely far too much on our own thoughts about the poor or needy (&quot;She/He has been here every month asking for help. Why don&#039;t they try to help themselves?&quot; - or - &quot;We have to set guidelines for our assistance programs because otherwise people would be calling us day and night and would bleed us dry in no time. Then, what would we have to help somebody else? We have to use these guidelines so that everyone gets an equal share.&quot;) People say things like this because they are not relying on the Divine leading of the Holy Spirit or the voice of the Lord in giving!

I must admit, I&#039;ve been to a charity or two in my day, when things were very tough. And you know something? Not once, and I repeat, not once, did any of them stop, find a quiet place, be still or humble before the Lord, and pray for me and with me before giving any assistance. That is sad, but true. 

Also, I have never read anything in the bible related to charity or giving where it says that one should equally dish out, in tiny amounts, assistance to individuals, provided they meet certain criteria. Some might point fingers of blame and say, &quot;How can any Christian person pass by a sick homeless person on the street and barely give them a glance, let alone a dollar or two?&quot; To answer them I would say, they pass by because they either are not led by the Holy Spirit to give to that person at that time OR they are so far removed from a personal relationship with God that they can&#039;t hear Him when he calls.

The idea of a ten percent rule is the easy way out, I think. I&#039;ve heard people say, &quot;Well, I don&#039;t have to give to such n so, because I&#039;ve already gave my ten percent out of this week&#039;s check.&quot; I&#039;m guessing some of your readers have heard the same, or even said it themselves.  It is too often used as an excuse not to give, and even more often, viewed as a chore, drudgery, requirement, or commandment. Jesus said to be a cheerful giver, yet so many open their hands and plop their offerings in while they cringe in the act. Why give anything to the Lord if you despise the act? Does not the Bible tell us that, with God&#039;s own voice, we were told that He detests the offerings, the sacrifices, the feasts, the songs and dance, because they are not done with a right heart or right mind?

I will say one more comment, and then I must go. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I had money in my wallet, not really needing it for a specific or pressing issue, and I hear that still small voice prompting me to give it to some complete stranger or use it for some strange purpose. And you know, I would much rather give by the prompting of my Father, regardless of if its 1% or 50% or 100% than to delude myself into thinking I&#039;m all great and wonderful by giving a dictated 10% at a place where I think is right, at my convenience, where everyone can see me. No, I would rather know that my gift went where it was supposed to go, according to God&#039;s will, not my own. I&#039;d rather stay away from the tax deductions for charitable religious giving (end-of-year tithing envelopes). 

Does the Bible abolish the 10% rule? Yes. Should we stop giving? No! And to be honest, we should give even more now than ever before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just happened to find your website here as I was looking for the topic &#8220;what does the bible say about debt.&#8221; And, I must admit, what you are saying is true. To a degree, that is. </p>
<p>On one hand, the ten percent rule and the notion of tithing in and of itself was done away with, this is true. However, Jesus commissioned His believers to give with a cheerful heart and with gladness. If anyone asks anything of us, we should give it to them. I think this would apply to us today. We should not be so greedy with what we have, and that included money. </p>
<p>Some might say, &#8220;Well, they don&#8217;t share. They&#8217;re not living right.&#8221; Or, &#8220;I called so n so church for help, and they wouldn&#8217;t help me. They aren&#8217;t a good church or christians.&#8221; These things are so very common throughout our nation. I think that we human people rely far too much on our own thoughts about the poor or needy (&#8220;She/He has been here every month asking for help. Why don&#8217;t they try to help themselves?&#8221; &#8211; or &#8211; &#8220;We have to set guidelines for our assistance programs because otherwise people would be calling us day and night and would bleed us dry in no time. Then, what would we have to help somebody else? We have to use these guidelines so that everyone gets an equal share.&#8221;) People say things like this because they are not relying on the Divine leading of the Holy Spirit or the voice of the Lord in giving!</p>
<p>I must admit, I&#8217;ve been to a charity or two in my day, when things were very tough. And you know something? Not once, and I repeat, not once, did any of them stop, find a quiet place, be still or humble before the Lord, and pray for me and with me before giving any assistance. That is sad, but true. </p>
<p>Also, I have never read anything in the bible related to charity or giving where it says that one should equally dish out, in tiny amounts, assistance to individuals, provided they meet certain criteria. Some might point fingers of blame and say, &#8220;How can any Christian person pass by a sick homeless person on the street and barely give them a glance, let alone a dollar or two?&#8221; To answer them I would say, they pass by because they either are not led by the Holy Spirit to give to that person at that time OR they are so far removed from a personal relationship with God that they can&#8217;t hear Him when he calls.</p>
<p>The idea of a ten percent rule is the easy way out, I think. I&#8217;ve heard people say, &#8220;Well, I don&#8217;t have to give to such n so, because I&#8217;ve already gave my ten percent out of this week&#8217;s check.&#8221; I&#8217;m guessing some of your readers have heard the same, or even said it themselves.  It is too often used as an excuse not to give, and even more often, viewed as a chore, drudgery, requirement, or commandment. Jesus said to be a cheerful giver, yet so many open their hands and plop their offerings in while they cringe in the act. Why give anything to the Lord if you despise the act? Does not the Bible tell us that, with God&#8217;s own voice, we were told that He detests the offerings, the sacrifices, the feasts, the songs and dance, because they are not done with a right heart or right mind?</p>
<p>I will say one more comment, and then I must go. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I had money in my wallet, not really needing it for a specific or pressing issue, and I hear that still small voice prompting me to give it to some complete stranger or use it for some strange purpose. And you know, I would much rather give by the prompting of my Father, regardless of if its 1% or 50% or 100% than to delude myself into thinking I&#8217;m all great and wonderful by giving a dictated 10% at a place where I think is right, at my convenience, where everyone can see me. No, I would rather know that my gift went where it was supposed to go, according to God&#8217;s will, not my own. I&#8217;d rather stay away from the tax deductions for charitable religious giving (end-of-year tithing envelopes). </p>
<p>Does the Bible abolish the 10% rule? Yes. Should we stop giving? No! And to be honest, we should give even more now than ever before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Testament and the People of God &#8211; Review 01 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/book-reviews/ntpg-rev01#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=4318#comment-682</guid>
		<description>I probably lean to the theological approach but am waiting for the pnematological approach to be invented. The first question asked in this approach would be, &quot;what was the Holy Spirit&#039;s intent when inspiring the author to write the passage?&quot;

Great post, Matthew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably lean to the theological approach but am waiting for the pnematological approach to be invented. The first question asked in this approach would be, &#8220;what was the Holy Spirit&#8217;s intent when inspiring the author to write the passage?&#8221;</p>
<p>Great post, Matthew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tithe is Illegal by Chris</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/guest-articles/the-tithe-is-illegal#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawreligion.com/?p=66#comment-673</guid>
		<description>I loved the website....So many of God&#039;s children are having their eyes opened!

Jesus says that tithing is one of the &#039;matters of the Law&#039; (Mat 23:23).  This is conformed in Heb 7:5

Yes the pharisees &#039;ought to tithe&#039; ...but let us look at what they tithed (herbs and not money) 
Anyone who teaches that tithing is a &#039;spritual principle&#039; is saying that Jesus was not correct.

As a matter of the Law we have no right to &#039;change one jot or tittle&#039;...or Jesus says we will make ourselves &#039;LEAST in the kingdom of heaven &#039; (Mat5:18-19). The Law itself warns strongly against this.

Who then authouised the following changes:-

1) Tithing was only to be produce of the promised Land (Lev 27:30&amp;32)...who changed it to money as preached today
2) Tithing was only ever to be given to Levites (Numbers 18:21-24) under a covenant....who authorised &#039;pastors&#039; and church organisations to touch it
3) Tithes were given to Levites because they forfeited their inheritance...who said people who own property can touch it?
4) Tithes were for Israel only (Lev 27:1 &amp; 34)...who said Gentiles should tithe contrary to Acts 15 and Gal 2:10?
5) Tithes were to be eaten by the giver and shared with the POOR...Deut 14:22-29....who authorised this change?

Pastors and churches propogating this deception REPENT or you will ensure  that your lifes work earns you NO rewards in eternity

regards in Christ
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the website&#8230;.So many of God&#8217;s children are having their eyes opened!</p>
<p>Jesus says that tithing is one of the &#8216;matters of the Law&#8217; (Mat 23:23).  This is conformed in Heb 7:5</p>
<p>Yes the pharisees &#8216;ought to tithe&#8217; &#8230;but let us look at what they tithed (herbs and not money)<br />
Anyone who teaches that tithing is a &#8216;spritual principle&#8217; is saying that Jesus was not correct.</p>
<p>As a matter of the Law we have no right to &#8216;change one jot or tittle&#8217;&#8230;or Jesus says we will make ourselves &#8216;LEAST in the kingdom of heaven &#8216; (Mat5:18-19). The Law itself warns strongly against this.</p>
<p>Who then authouised the following changes:-</p>
<p>1) Tithing was only to be produce of the promised Land (Lev 27:30&amp;32)&#8230;who changed it to money as preached today<br />
2) Tithing was only ever to be given to Levites (Numbers 18:21-24) under a covenant&#8230;.who authorised &#8216;pastors&#8217; and church organisations to touch it<br />
3) Tithes were given to Levites because they forfeited their inheritance&#8230;who said people who own property can touch it?<br />
4) Tithes were for Israel only (Lev 27:1 &amp; 34)&#8230;who said Gentiles should tithe contrary to Acts 15 and Gal 2:10?<br />
5) Tithes were to be eaten by the giver and shared with the POOR&#8230;Deut 14:22-29&#8230;.who authorised this change?</p>
<p>Pastors and churches propogating this deception REPENT or you will ensure  that your lifes work earns you NO rewards in eternity</p>
<p>regards in Christ<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roll Back the Clocks by Katie D</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/thoughts/roll-back-the-clocks#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=1434#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Nice!  It will be interesting to hear your points after another 10 years.  BTW - your smile is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!  It will be interesting to hear your points after another 10 years.  BTW &#8211; your smile is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roll Back the Clocks by Erik M Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/thoughts/roll-back-the-clocks#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik M Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=1434#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing the valuable insights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing the valuable insights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protein Shakes! by matthewberry</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/updates/protein-shakes#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=11#comment-678</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going good. Thanks for asking.

I am about two weeks into it.  Have another week to go.  I&#039;ve lost some weight and I feel better so no complaints here.

The only bummer was eating fruits and veggies alone for 10 days.  Bring on the chicken!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going good. Thanks for asking.</p>
<p>I am about two weeks into it.  Have another week to go.  I&#8217;ve lost some weight and I feel better so no complaints here.</p>
<p>The only bummer was eating fruits and veggies alone for 10 days.  Bring on the chicken!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protein Shakes! by Dave</title>
		<link>http://rawreligion.com/updates/protein-shakes#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewberry.info/?p=11#comment-677</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s the cleanse going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s the cleanse going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

